Free tool · no signup

Turn a pile of feedback into an order of work

Twenty scattered notes from three people, half of them repeats and two of them contradicting each other. Paste the lot and get back a plan: grouped by discipline, prioritised by impact, conflicts flagged for the client to settle.

implementation-plan.md · 3 changeswrithink
[P1]Hero headline — scale it up, tighten the leading, more contrast.
[P2]The CTA fails AA contrast: darken the color.
[P3]Remove the duplicate pricing card · 2 comments merged.
→ paste into Claude · Cursor · ChatGPTCopy prompt
Nothing yet0/8000

Free, no account. What you paste is sent to the model that builds the plan and isn’t stored afterwards — don’t paste anything confidential.

Your implementation plan

Paste your feedback on the left, then build the plan.

Paste it into your tracker, or hand it to an AI coding assistant as the order of work. Collect this feedback with Writhink and every item already knows which page and which element it belongs to.

What it does

What the plan actually does to your list

  • Merges the repeats. Three people asking for a bigger headline is one task, not three.
  • Flags the contradictions instead of choosing for you — those are the client's call, and asking early is cheaper than building twice.
  • Splits the work by who does it: design, development, content. A copy change and a layout change do not belong in the same batch.
  • Orders by impact on the visitor, not by how quick something is to fix.
  • Separates out what nobody can act on yet, with the question that would unblock each one.

Then

The plan is only as good as the feedback

“The button is hard to see” can only ever become a medium-priority guess. Collected with Writhink, the same sentence arrives pinned to a specific button, on a specific page, at a specific viewport, with a screenshot — and it becomes a task someone can start.

FAQ

Questions people actually ask

How is this different from the feedback-to-prompt tool?
That one produces a prompt for an AI assistant to execute. This one produces a plan for a person to work through: grouped by discipline, prioritised, with contradictions flagged and a suggested order. Use that one to build, this one to decide what to build first.
What counts as a conflict?
Two requests that cannot both be satisfied — one asking to remove the hero and another asking to make the hero title bigger, for example. Those are decisions for the client, not for you, and the plan surfaces them instead of silently picking one.
How does it decide priority?
By impact on the person using the site, not by how long the task takes. A broken contact form outranks a photo that looks stretched, even though the photo is faster to fix.
Is anything stored?
No. The text is sent to the model that builds the plan and is not kept afterwards. As with any AI tool, don't paste confidential material into it.